Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2015 | NR1705 15
Original file (NR1705 15.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

HCG
Docket No. NR1705-15
4 May 15

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
TOs Secretary of the Navy

Subj]: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO

Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) HOMC memo 1400/3 MMPR-2 dtd 17 Apr 15
(3) Subject’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter
referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board
requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected
to back date an advancement.

2. The Board, consisting a. jy 4g
reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and 1 stice on 30 April

2015 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective
action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of
record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and
policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having
cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner's
application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and
warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds
the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective
action.
Docket No. NR1705-15
RECOMMENDATION :

That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to
show that:

a. Petitioner is advanced to SSgt/E-6 effective 1 February 2011.

b. Note: Petitioner’s delay in advancement was caused by an NUP
and Fitness Report that have been removed. Petitioner is advanced
effective her originally authorized advancement date of 1 February
2011.°

c. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.

.4. It is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and
deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of
the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled

  

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the

Navy.
4 May 15

ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6980 14

    Original file (NR6980 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    NR6980-14 28 Jan 15 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of To; Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.c. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval-record be corrected to authorize advancement to a higher grade. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 12586 11

    Original file (12586 11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    12586-11 24 February 2012 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF {ig Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he advanced to E-6/DC1 from the March 2011 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 12739 11

    Original file (12739 11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner Filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he advanced to E-4/PR3 from the March 2011 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 13 February 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06447-10

    Original file (06447-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to E-4/HM3 from the March 2009, Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 31 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10656-10

    Original file (10656-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to E-6/HM1 from the August 2009, Reserve Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 31 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 13159-10

    Original file (13159-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to E-5/ET2 from the March 2009, Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 31 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00424-11

    Original file (00424-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to E-6/HM1 from the August 2009, Reserve Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 31 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06070-11

    Original file (06070-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in paygrade E-2, vice E-1. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, George, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 11 July 2011...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01606-11

    Original file (01606-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show execution of a 24 month extension to comply with, and receive the benefits of, the Advanced Electronics Field (AEF) Program. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 13543-10

    Original file (13543-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to E-5/HM2 from the September 2008, Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Pfeiffer and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 7 February 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...